Am Sonntag, 23. August 2009 21:23:25 schrieb bugs buggy: > It is apparent that the current way we do Changelogs isn't the best > way, since it is way more time consuming than it should be. It should present the user a good overview about new features, which existing things important to him have been changed or bugfixed. That is a kind of "service" and thus implies to take some time. Whether it is more or less than it should be depends on how userfriendly someone is, and how many detail users and distributors want.
> We could just drop the revision number, and stick with tickets, Sounds reasonable. Especially since the revisions are mentioned in the tickets and also of no importance to the average user. Further they are different for trunk and branches and thus backports will create a mess. > or we could use svn2cl to produce the changelog for us. In that case we need to move the current ChangeLog to NEWS (GNU style). Replacing current ChangeLog with an svn2cl generated ChangeLog is definitely not an option to me. The changelog shall be user readable, and also only contain things interesting to the user. It shall be grouped by topics and arranged by importance and significance. That is not possible for a machine to do. Regards, Devu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
