On 11/8/09, Christian Ohm <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 13:50, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Christian Ohm <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey, I didn't decide that exactly. I'd branch 2.3 off from 2.2, and merge > > > 2.2_net into it. Then we release 2.3 betas/rcs from that, and keep 2.2 > and 2.3 > > > in sync (apart from the netcode) until 2.3.0, accompanied by one last 2.2 > > > release. > > Sounds like a lot of work... but I won't stand in the way if you want to > do it. > > > Well, that's what I would do, but I can't do the actual release builds etc. > Not > sure if anyone else wants to keep 2.2 around. But I don't think the 2.3 beta > cycle should be very long, since most people will wait for a "real" release > anyway, so the parallel 2.2/2.3 phase shouldn't be that much work. >
Sorry guys, can't get the newer dev package to work correctly, and I am out of time for doing a release today. Thus, it is postponed, until I get back next week. :( BTW, we would have 2.2_net, 2.2, 2.3.0 b1 (tag made from 2.2_net) and trunk...right? _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
