On 4/17/10, Christian Ohm wrote: > On Saturday, 17 April 2010 at 15:45, buginator wrote: > > Let's try this again, 2.3 is in a code freeze, and ONLY show stopping > > bugs will be fixed. > > > > It was suggested that we branch 2.3.0 from svn head, once we know the > > status of the Dydo changes. > > > Actually, I'd branch 2.3.0 from the rc tag as soon as possible, since the > whole > point of branching is that the 2.3 branch then is not frozen, only the 2.3.0 > branch (which then can get selected backports from 2.3). Zarel proposed a tag > instead of a branch for 2.3.0, to which we commit until the final release. > Doesn't matter much to me, it's all the same anyway in svn. >
Ok, I am fine with either a tag or a branch, as soon as Per OKs it, then whoever can tag it. He might want to get his .02 on this issue, and if we don't hear from Per by Sunday evening, then we can just make the branch or tag then. I only know of 2 patches that need to be applied so far... _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
