On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:44:35AM -0400, buginator wrote: > Since we have fairly frequent releases, the builds in Debian stable > end up being quite old. This also means that Ubuntu will pull in old > versions, and on down the line.
AFAIK Ubuntu pulls in from Debian testing into their own pre-release (testing equivalent) version, which later on becomes their stable release. > Should we just not be in stable, and only be in testing, or doesn't it > matter much? > > My opinion on this is, we should just be in testing, we don't support > old builds anyway, and I see no reason for us to have a version in > Debian stable. You do know that testing is what eventually becomes stable? So if we'd never want to be in stable we shouldn't be in testing to begin with. Aside from that, people that use stable usually use it for its stability and are quite aware of the fact that most software they run is far from the bleeding edge. So my vote would be to leave it as it is right now. -- Giel -- "There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses." -- Bjarne Stroustrup
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
