On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:19 AM, aidy lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > Hi Bret, > > On 11/11/2008, Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > aidy lewis wrote: > > > Do we still need to require 'firewatir' in 1.6.2. > > > > Probably not, although it doesn't hurt. > > > > > And if not shall I > > > 'gem unistall firewatir'? > > > > > > > Only if you aren't going to use it. Although again it doesn't hurt to > > leave it. > > > > If I have the old seperate gem installed would it not require that? I > know Ruby will load the latest gem, but firewatir, is now contained > within Watir. > > Aidy > > I use gem 'watir', '=1.5.3' require 'watir' to make sure the my 'lower version' is activated by rubygems if I have watir 1.6.2 installed for experimentation. -- marekj | i can has watir framework http://www.bitbucket.org/marekj/watirloo/ Semantic Page Objects Modeling in Watir --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Watir General" group. To post to this group, send email to watir-general@googlegroups.com Before posting, please read the following guidelines: http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Support To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
