Frames are evil. Most "web 2.0" developers I know try to avoid them like the plague. I cannot share with you (without lots of censoring) what my web-devs say about people that still use frames. (well except for the dev from Russia, he just said 'they should be taken out and shot'.. (Stalin would be proud to see his influence persists still to this day in that culture <JOKE!!>), so no censoring needed there)
you should ridicule your developers for being so old school, and not keeping up with modern web design and development. (grin) well ok maybe not ridicule, but I'd still give them some good natured ribbing about how their outdated design is making it difficult for you to test their stuff. On Aug 13, 7:00 am, Chan Nguyen <atbl1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Željko again, > Thanks for your clear answer ;) ! I will keep this in mind "Only > Frame" ^_^ ! > > On Aug 13, 12:33 am, Željko Filipin <zeljko.fili...@wa-research.ch> > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Chan Nguyen <atbl1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So this problem is only with "frame"? > > > Yes. > > > > Is there any other element that we have to do this kind of "nested call" ? > > > No. > > > > What's the easiest way to access an element? > > > What's the most usable way to access an element? > > > Make sure element has ID attribute. > > > Željko > > -- > > watir.com - community manager > > watirpodcast.com - host > > testingpodcast.com - audio podcasts on software testing. all of them > > vidipodkast.com - pričamo o hardveru, softveru i časopisu Vidi -- Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before you ask, be nice. You received this message because you are subscribed to http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general To post: watir-general@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe: watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
