Yep, I understand. A lot similar does page-object by wrapping elements in own 
classes thus allowing to support both watir-webdriver and selenium-webdriver. 
The point of watirsome is a bit different - it exposes Watir classes so you 
could work with the same old well-known API. That's what I needed.

-- 
Cheerz,
Alex Rodionov


On Sunday, May 19, 2013 at 21:29 , Jarmo Pertman wrote:

> By the way, element class method in test-page is not the same as your 
> tag-based methods. Element in test-page is a method for providing container 
> element - e.g. like "el" in Backbone.js. The method name is "element" because 
> it is framework agnostic - e.g. you can use it with Watir-WebDriver, 
> Selenium-Webdriver, Capybara or with whatever other framework - i'd say 
> that's the real main difference between test-page and Watirsome.
> 
> Jarmo
> 
> On Saturday, May 18, 2013 7:22:18 PM UTC+3, Alex Rodionov wrote:
> > For the record, I have updated Watir readme to include all these libraries.
> > 
> > On Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:19:47 PM UTC+7, Alex Rodionov wrote:
> > > @Jarmo @Chuck
> > > 
> > > I created this because I've been using page-object 
> > > (https://github.com/cheezy/page-object) for more than a year and I didn't 
> > > know abut test-factory and test-page. It has a bit different API compared 
> > > to them: test-factory and test-page provide with #element class method, 
> > > while page-object provides with a range of tag-based methods (#div, 
> > > #text_field, etc.) I find it much nicer as it is more readable.
> > > 
> > > I've been contributing to page-object constantly but at some point faced 
> > > architecture limitations which resulted that it may be easier to create 
> > > my own library which implements similar API other than modify 
> > > page-object. So I did just the same.
> > > 
> > > The main idea is to be as close to Watir API as possible (the same 
> > > locators, method names) + some extra stuff. It's achieved because 
> > > watirsome is practically a "proxy" to Watir browser. This allowed me to 
> > > move all element definitions to class methods so it's much easier to 
> > > support such page classes.
> > > 
> > > Extra stuff includes initializers for page classes and region modules (to 
> > > support polymorphous page objects 
> > > (http://p0deje.blogspot.ru/2012/01/polymorphous-page-objects.html)), 
> > > custom locators which for now is any boolean method Watir::Element 
> > > responds to. For example:
> > > 
> > > # find first visible text field with label "Username"
> > > text_field :username, label: 'Username', visible: true
> > > 
> > > I treat it as an alternative to gems you mentioned which is more suitable 
> > > for me.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:46:25 PM UTC+7, Jarmo Pertman wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > If you're looking something really lightweight, then my gem Test::Page 
> > > > is the one you're looking for:
> > > > https://github.com/jarmo/test-page
> > > > 
> > > > Jarmo
> > > > 
> > > > On Friday, May 17, 2013 11:46:18 PM UTC+3, Chuck van der Linden wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, May 13, 2013 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Alex Rodionov wrote:
> > > > > > Hey guys! 
> > > > > > I've recently released Watirsome, which is a gem I've been using at 
> > > > > > work for a long time as an alternative to well known page-object. 
> > > > > > It's a lot similar to it, but more dynamic and based on 
> > > > > > watir-webdriver. Thus (at least for now), it works only with it.
> > > > > > Anyways, you can take a look at https://github.com/p0deje/watirsome 
> > > > > > and probably give it a shot!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > How is it different from, or would you contrast it with the 
> > > > > "test-factory" page objects gem?  
> > > > > http://rubygems.org/gems/test-factory
> > > > > 
> > > > > just wondering as that is a lightweight, designed for Watir page 
> > > > > objects gem that I'm using (and so far like very much)  
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
> you ask, be nice.
>  
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
> [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])
>  
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Watir General" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/watir-general/7a9os1u67MI/unsubscribe?hl=en.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
[email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Watir General" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to