No problem On 26-Oct-2017 9:05 PM, "Titus Fortner" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can't tell if you are trolling or just intentionally missing the point. > > The use of the element method is never *required. You may prefer it for > your own reasons, but that's not the same. > > I think I've made my reasonable request clear, even if you don't > understand it. I'm done explaining this. > > > > On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 12:16:18 AM UTC-5, [email protected] > wrote: >> >> Non-standard usage? But still it's taking an advantages of WATIR, >> b.element() is not completely equivalent to driver.find_element(), it does >> the element_call so many things are taken care of! >> >> On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 5:20:12 AM UTC+5:30, Titus Fortner wrote: >>> >>> There are some good reasons to use watir 6+ even when not taking full >>> advantage of the location API. I'm behind on blogging all these things. >>> >>> I just don't want to encourage non standard usage in our official >>> mailing list. >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > -- > -- > Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search > before you ask, be nice. > > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > [email protected] > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Watir General" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before you ask, be nice. [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Watir General" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
