[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13188395#comment-13188395
 ] 

Alex North commented on WAVE-126:
---------------------------------

Dummy wavelets are old cruft. I recommend you try to remove all references to 
them.

In very early versions of FedOne, the first open source prototype, there was no 
indexing or inbox (or persistence). A magic dummy wavelet was generated that 
contained information about what was in a client's inbox. The wavelet was never 
explicitly represented or stored, just deltas were computed and sent to the 
client.

Now that I gather WIAB has more reasonable indexing going, dummy wavelets have 
no place.

                
> Wave in a box server is creating "dummy" wavelets
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WAVE-126
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-126
>             Project: Wave
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I have no idea what these are for - perhaps because in the old protocol the 
> wavelet id field was not optional, and non-wavelet updates (like channel ids) 
> needed to fill it in?
> In any case, these dummy wavelets are unnecessary with the new protocol.  I'm 
> mainly filing this bug to give a reference against which the hack code in the 
> client can be marked.
> ---
> Issue imported from 
> http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues/detail?id=125
> Owner: [email protected]
> Label: Type-Defect
> Label: Priority-Medium
> Stars: 2
> State: open
> Status: New

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to