Was wrong about the _wave bit being necessary - the rest is accurate though.

--Nathanael Abbotts
On 24 Jan 2011 22:49, "Yuri Z" <[email protected]> wrote:
> try to use http://echoey-wave.appspot.com/ - the echoey bot.
> As Nat said - you register it with robot name [email protected] and enter
> URL: http://echoey-wave.appspot.com/
> After registration you just add a new participant - [email protected].
>
> 2011/1/25 Nathanael Abbotts <[email protected]>
>
>> I believe you use the address of the server you registered them at - so
if
>> you registered at wave.com, and named your robot on there as Joe, you
>> would
>> add [email protected] to communicate with it.
>>
>> --Nathanael Abbotts
>> On 24 Jan 2011 22:39, "Gerardo Lozano" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Yes, I used "appspot" when registering the robots, and my server when
>> adding
>> > them to waves.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2011/1/24 Lennard de Rijk <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 23:09, Gerardo Lozano <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > We registered the bots via that URL.
>> >> >
>> >> > We found some issues:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > - Not adding "http://"; causes uri.getHost() to be 'null'
consequently
>> >> it
>> >> > appends null to the robotLocation string (this is
>> >> > org.waveprotocol.box.server.robots.RobotRegistrationServlet.java)
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Fixing this right now.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > - If correctly typed, the registered robot, after being added to a
>> >> wave,
>> >> > does not do anything within the wave. There is not even any evidence
>> in
>> >> > the
>> >> > LOG that the robot is doing anything. ='(
>> >> > - We tried several formats for adding the bots including "http://
>> >> > <robot>.
>> >> > appsot.com", "<robot>.appspot.com", "http://<robot>@appspot.com",and
>> >> > "<robot>@appspot.com" still with no results
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> The address you registered the robot on should just be fine. I take it
>> you
>> >> actually replace @appspot.com with whatever your server is set up to
>> >> serve?
>> >>
>> >> Greetings,
>> >> Lennard
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > gera
>>

Reply via email to