Actually, reading the comments his position seems a lot more reasonable. They weren't aware http was just being considered as an option, and there seems a general disconnect in communication due to the WiaB apache project being about...well....the WiaB implementation, and there not being a clear place for people to discus the protocol.
This seems a legitimate complaint to me that should be addressed to help foster collaboration from those wanting to make their own federated servers. ~~~~~~ Reviews of anything, by anyone; www.rateoholic.co.uk Please try out my new site and give feedback :) On 28 January 2011 10:35, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Typo XMPP > > --- On Fri, 28/1/11, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Paul Thomas <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: ProcessOne appears to be forking >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Friday, 28 January, 2011, 9:28 >> I won't be hard to convince people >> that XMTP is superior, but you won't do >> that if they are unable to trial WAIB or it is too much >> hassle. >> >> As far as I'm concerned HTTP is just an idea, it mightn't >> even be implemented. >> >> If you think HTTP is a bad idea. Some are/were convinced >> that SMTP is the natural protocol to use due to the now >> infamous and false email analogy no doubt >> >> --- On Fri, 28/1/11, Alex North <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> From: Alex North <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: ProcessOne appears to be forking >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Friday, 28 January, 2011, 1:57 >> >> On 28 January 2011 09:04, James Purser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > MIght be an idea for someone to post a response on the >> blog. Just to >> > clarify >> > a couple of items >> > >> > >> Please don't post on behalf of the project, though of >> course feel free to >> express personal opinions. >> >> >> > James >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Torben Weis <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > How ridiculous. >> > > >> > > Torben >> > > >> > > 2011/1/27 James Purser <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://www.process-one.net/en/blogs/article/xwave_a_tribute_to_google_wave_team/ >> > > > >> > > > So it appears that processOne is setting >> themselves up as an >> > alternative >> > > > reference implementation based on the fact >> that they don't like the >> > work >> > > > being done on the http version of the >> protocol. >> > > > >> > > > James >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > --------------------------- >> > > Prof. Torben Weis >> > > Universitaet Duisburg-Essen >> > > [email protected] >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
