Large waves are a problem in general. I wonder how WIAB would cope. it is 
definitely something that need to be addressed, how to represent large waves. 




----- Original Message ----
From: STenyaK <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Paul Thomas <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, 22 February, 2011 12:41:06
Subject: Re: is wave playback a priority right now?

In GWave it looked like an initial state was loaded, and then changesets
were loaded and then applied to the initial state. If that's correct, I
think we definitely need a different approach that doesn't use that much
bandwidth and computing resources.
I'd suggest sticking with that same approach, but creating state snapshots
every N changesets, or every N time, or N bytes of content, or something
similar.

GWave approach works for small/short waves, but for long-term or widely used
waves, it was unsustainable.

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:52, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't know, but it wasn't too smooth with Gwave.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Gerardo Lozano <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Mon, 21 February, 2011 19:31:37
> Subject: Re: is wave playback a priority right now?
>
> What would be the best way to approach playback implementation?
>
> This is what we've got:
>
> We've been looking at the code for the past few days now, and we think that
> a good approach is to somehow get the a history of the wavelet deltas
> (either from memory of from store) and then either apply the delta (done
> with or in an Instance WaveletState) or append (done with or in an instance
> of WaveletProvider them each time the playback is requested.
>
> To us, it seems that the most viable way to implement playback is to get
> the
> delta history from the store (with last week's implementation) and then
> somehow build up from that.
>
> What would you guys recommend doing?
>
>
>
> 2011/2/8 James Purser <[email protected]>
>
> > Not at the moment, but if anyone wants to pick it up and run with it,
> then
> > please feel free :)
> >
> > James
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > AFAIK - playback is not a priority at the moment and no one is working
> on
> > > it. If someone does - please correct me.
> > >
> > > 2011/2/8 Gerardo Lozano <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > Hi everybody!
> > > >
> > > > Is anybody planning on working on wave playback? This is on the WIAB
> > > > roadmap, but it has a blank status.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Gerardo L.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Gerardo L.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Saludos,
     Bruno González

_______________________________________________
Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
http://www.stenyak.com




Reply via email to