On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 17:17, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Doesn't mater what we call our next goal, but if we call it 1.0 it
> should have federation working to an acceptable level. (as 1.0 is a
> public perception thing).
>
If history can teach us anything (initial GWave release, KDE v4.0, etc),
then regardless of what the wave dev community states about a v1.0 release,
the general public and critics will *demand* it to be feature complete, fast
and bug-free. If we cannot provide that in the short term, then we should
wait longer before we slap the "v1.0" label to WiaB. If we want to give a
name to the next set of goals, I also vote for using "v0.5" or something
similar.
--
Saludos,
Bruno González
_______________________________________________
Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
http://www.stenyak.com
