Like call it Moya then, from Farscape ;)
(hay, it did last longer....)

On 29 May 2011 12:52, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> face palm. more firefly references...ominous :/
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Adrian Cochrane <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sun, 29 May, 2011 9:58:12
> Subject: protocols
>
> avid Hearnden <[email protected]>      Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:36 AM
>> Reply-To: [email protected], [email protected]
>> To: wave-dev <[email protected]>
>> There is a technical roadmap (i.e., rich design docs etc, published
>> somewhere on the site - let me know if you can't find them) for a new
>> protocol that overcomes many of the issues with the current one, and works
>> much better with more advanced features (e.g. diff-on-open).  I don't think
>> it's a moving target - the doc has been ready for a few months, and I don't
>> think anyone has significant changes to it in mind.  However, AFAIK, nobody
>> who's available has signed up to do the work, so there is no timeline for
>> it.  I was keen to get into it a few months back, and Alex North was too,
>> but both our availabilities have significantly diminished.  It's probably
>> about 2-3 weeks of work for someone to see it through end to end though.  It
>> was previously blocked by a few things that have now been implemented.
>
>> I would strongly encourage not building too much on the current protocol,
>> since it has a number of known limitations.  The new protocol is simpler and
>> achieves a better separation of functionality.  If there are a few people
>> (PyOfWave?) with the will and a bit of time, then it is very achievable to
>> get it rolled out.
>
>> -Dave
>
> I will be proud to go over it, but (because I want to be liberal) I'd
> first ask to start
> with a forum or mailing list which I'd refer to as 'The Confederate'
> after Firefly T.V.
> series which gave Wave it's name. I've already exchanged some messages
> with josephg on GitHub on
> the shareJS Wave project on this.
>
> What I planned to work with, if I didn't get proper standardization, is
> the extended original
> standards (to make up for some lacking features I say), a non-HTTP
> alternative to Simple Data
> Protocol, an fully designed Gadget API in a derivative of CoffeeScript
> (to simplify offline clients),
> and a URL scheme to serve for embedding, WaveThis, and a alias query for
> groups.
>
> I'll get started on it provided that I am provided with the necessary
> information on how to do
> it. However on my project, I've got some work on PyOfWave to finish.
> --
>  [email protected]
>
> --
> http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free

Reply via email to