Thanks for putting this together. It's great that you are interested in WiaB. To answer one of your questions, this kind of document really should be posted on the apache incubator web site. However, I have been struggling with how we should really manage this web site. The Apache CMS is a decent tool, but it really isn't being advanced at this point and doesn't support basic things like tables. So I question the ability to really create a first rate web site with it. The confluence option is now also off the table. Given that I am not sure what we are going to do.
One question on your document. I am wondering about "agents". You state that they are similar to Robots but that they run inside the server. Robots already run inside the server, so I don't see the distinction. Can you elaborate a little on that? ~Michael On Jul 20, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Michael Lilly wrote: > Hi, code-laboration is working on a project that uses WIAB as the core > framework, but with modifications to the UI and the UX. We saw that there > were just some talks about modularisation, and had actually been thinking of > the same thing for the past several days. We had talked to Yuri the other > day about this, and now feel it is at a point where we can share our > interests with everyone. > > Because we will be doing so many modifications, it would be great for WIAB > to be more modular to allow for us, and potentially other forks of the WIAB > project to work in parallel. We have come up with a list of things that we > personally feel would be a great help to modularize. the document is posted > on Google Docs. This document is a rough draft of what would be changed, and > is fully open to comments of the dev community. Here is the Doc: > http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fpub%3Fid%3D1V4PaVPMKPdt0-BugDxmy0dfvmf9UJh-MvLDRBd-vk_Q > > Also, we have been creating documentation related to WIAB, and would like to > share them with the community. I see there is a wiki on the Apache incubator > website, but with no content. So I am wondering where the proper place would > be to add this content. > > We do not have much on our websites currently, but you are free to check it > out. Our two websites are codelaboration.com and twykin.com
