Perhaps we should just update to socket.io 0.8 for now and try to gather some pros and cons for atmosphere. Do we have codereview working for the new repo? Can't we setup a GitHub repo using git-svn? It would allow forking and pull requests ;)
Regards, Nelson No dia 14 de Out de 2011 19:18, "Scott Wilson" < scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com> escreveu: > On 14 Oct 2011, at 18:29, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote: > > > El 10/04/11 16:32, Nelson Silva escribió: > >> Atmosphere (http://atmosphere.dev.java.net > >> <http://atmosphere.dev.java.net/>) has an Apache License (at least > >> that's the one in GitHub) and v0.7 has: > >> > >> - Native GWT support > >> - WebSocket emulator support (Iike Flash) > >> - Easier integration with Guice > >> - Servlet 3.0 support > >> - Jersey support > >> - Atmosphere > > Meteor > > module > > which allows > > any > > existing > > Servlet > > > >> based > > application > > (Wicket, > > JSP, > > JSF, > > etc.) > > > > to > > easily > > add > > > >> asynchronous > > support > >> - Massive scalability with a Cluster plugin architecture (JGroups, > >> JMS/ActiveMQ, Redis, XMPP,i etc.) > >> - Runs on any Java based Web Server, including Tomcat, Jetty, GlassFish, > >> Weblogic, Grizzly, JBossWeb and JBoss, Resin, etc > >> > >> v0.8 due before the summer will have : > >> > >> - Socket.IO support > >> - Cometd 2.2.x support > >> > >> What do you think ? > > > > Reopening this thread. > > > > About atmosphere release: > > https://github.com/Atmosphere/atmosphere > > "Atmosphere 0.8.0-RC1 is our official release, and our work in progress > > version is 0.8, targeted for end of October 2011" > > > > After looking in the atmosphere samples, and after looking some issues > > with sockeio-java: > > - not working with new versions of chrome/chromium because it uses > > previous socket.io 0.6 (I think), fixed in 0.8: > > https://github.com/LearnBoost/socket.io-client/issues/282 > > https://github.com/LearnBoost/socket.io/issues/429 > > - and having utf8 encode problems > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-187 > > - few (visible) activity > > > > I think we should look again on atmosphere. Nelson, any experience to > > share about that since April? Tad, what do you think? > > We've also got an open issue in Apache Wookie for finding a replacement for > DWR, which is the Comet lib which we currently use for our implementation of > the Wave Gadget API. Atmosphere certainly looks like an interesting > candidate. > > > > > Bests, > > -- > > Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado > > > > http://comunes.org > > http://ourproject.org > > http://homes.ourproject.org/~vjrj/blog > > > > "Recently, someone asked me if I believed in astrology. He seemed > > somewhat puzzled when I explained that the reason I don't is that I'm a > > Gemini." [Raymond Smullyan] > > > > > > > > > > > >
