I don't seem to be able to do this. (Well I can't see any way to assign myself to a task?) A look through the documentation suggests I might need to be granted the "Assign Issue"/"Assignable User" permission be granted for the wave project first.
On 9 December 2011 01:42, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > If you tackle this, remember to assign yourself to; > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-275 > :) > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > On 9 December 2011 01:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, AFAIK the code is legacy from Google Wave. I don't think that Linky >> should be implemented as robot/robot agent. I guess you can just register >> listener on update events and then insert the link annotation whenever text >> in the edited blip looks like a URL. >> So your suggestions sound right to me. >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Ali Lown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> There seem to be a few references to 'linky' distributed through the >>> code (in doodad/Link and doodad/Suggestion) does this mean someone >>> else is already implementing this? >>> >>> The diagram on the old FAQ [0] suggests that linky was implemented as >>> an agent. Does this mean that it should be implement as a robot agent >>> (eg. the Welcome Bot / the Password bot)? Does doing this not mean >>> that linky would need to be added explicitly as a wave participant. >>> Can this be done automatically and hidden? >>> >>> The text along with WAVE-275 suggests implementing as a 'listener' for >>> performance reasons. I assume this means hooking it up to the >>> EditorUpdateEvent class - where can I find information for how to make >>> an agent do this? >>> >>> As for detecting the start/end of links, doodad/Link/Link.java has the >>> WEB_SCHEMES collection which I assume I would want to listen for to >>> find the start of the text needing annotating. Detecting the end could >>> be done simply by a space in the text, surely? Since that wouldn't be >>> a valid part of any URL. >>> >>> Is this anywhere near correct? Any comments/hints? >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Ali >>> >>> [0]: http://www.waveprotocol.org/faq >>>
