Hi Michael, I found wave.wiab a bit confusing since that's wave."wave-in-a-box". That was all, I'd be okay with almost anything :).
- Lennard On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lennard, > > I am fine with box. Why don't you like wiab? I just want to understand > the concern. I as because I was thinking that we might make the released > artifact named something like > > "wiab-server-1.0.zip" > > I think for the released artifact, the product is called Wave in a Box, > not just box. I am fine with box though for the group id. What do you > think? > > ~Michael > > On Jun 15, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Michael MacFadden < > > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> We are selecting the top level maven group id and wanted to get some > >> feedback. There are two thoughts: > >> > >> > >> 1) Very top level group id. I am thinking that everything coming out of > >> the apache wave project could be: > >> > >> org.apache.wave > >> > >> > >> 2) Wave in a Box group id I am thinking potentially: > >> > >> org.apache.wave.wiab > >> > >> > > I would go with box instead of wiab. > > > > > >> > >> > >> The rationale being the long term we hope that the wave project might > >> produce gadgets robots, extensions and stuff beyond just wiab. We have > not > >> discussed the final module structure under this namespace. > >> > >> Comments welcome. > >> > >> ~Michael > >
