> On June 25, 2012, 6:54 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/wavepanel/view/dom/full/ContinuationIndicator.css,
> >  line 62
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/5426/diff/1/?file=112259#file112259line62>
> >
> >     I think that displaying only upper part of the "unknown" participant 
> > image doesn't look good. It looks a bit weird to me.
> 
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
>     Can you test the new patch? Also you can test it in action in 
> http://kune.cc.

I've tested it on kune.cc and I think it makes the blue line inline reply more 
visible and clearer to understand for newcomers.

Could it display (scaled down) the actual user avatar instead of the unknown 
one? IMHO that would make its function even clearer.
What about adding the "Click here to reply" text in the blip preview? It would 
make it match the reply box at the bottom of waves.


- Jeremy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5426/#review8555
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 25, 2012, 7:36 p.m., Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5426/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 25, 2012, 7:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for wave, Michael MacFadden, Yuri Zelikov, and Ali Lown.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Few people are using the inline reply (the on over blue border) compared to 
> the use of the "Reply" button.
> 
> This small patch improves the visibility and usability of the inline reply 
> and I think that encourage people to use it.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/wavepanel/view/dom/full/ContinuationIndicator.css
>  c2bc9a9 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5426/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested with "ant waveharness-hosted".
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado
> 
>

Reply via email to