done :) Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > This is great, so go for it now, thanks! > > One thing, it is probably worth forwarding this to secretary@a.o and > asking whether he wishes to record this at all. > > Upayavira > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012, at 11:38 PM, Angus Turner wrote: > > Hi All, > > Just forwarding this to the list so we have a record. I'm going to start > > doing another mega-patch to remove all the copyright stuff and fix up > > anything that I missed last round. It'll be up for review hopefully > > within > > the next day or two. > > > > Thanks > > Angus Turner > > h...@theangus.org > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Dan Peterson <dpeter...@google.com> > > Date: Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:39 AM > > Subject: Re: Wave Licenses > > To: Angus Turner <h...@theangus.org> > > > > > > Hey Angus, > > > > I've been given approval to let you know that it is fine to remove the > > copyright statements. > > > > Cheers, > > -Dan > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Angus Turner <h...@theangus.org> wrote: > > > > > One final thing. > > > We're looking at getting the 'copyright google' bits removed, mainly to > > > clean up the codebase I think. We however, need someone from Google to > > > remove them, or permission from Google to remove them ourselves. If > you had > > > the time it'd be greatly appreciated if you could find the time to > submit a > > > review with them cleaned out or get the appropriate person to send an > email > > > giving permission. > > > Thanks > > > Angus Turner > > > h...@theangus.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Angus Turner <h...@theangus.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks a heap > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> Angus Turner > > >> h...@theangus.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Dan Peterson <dpeter...@google.com > >wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hey there -- forwarded you the legal doc -- I believe it was the > "usual" > > >>> Apache CLA, but you have the full documents now. > > >>> > > >>> I'm unaware of anything that didn't happen or is outstanding between > > >>> Google and Apache re: wave incubator. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> -Dan > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Angus Turner <h...@theangus.org> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hey Dan, > > >>>> I was pointed to you as a possible source to shed some light on the > > >>>> license agreement that occurred between Google and Apache when we > inherited > > >>>> the codebase. > > >>>> Did Google just license it to us? Or did they give us ownership. > > >>>> The main reason being that there are still some 'Copyright Google > 2011 > > >>>> All Rights Reserved' headers littered around the codebase and we're > not > > >>>> sure if they should be there or not. > > >>>> > > >>>> Another thing is according to our mentor that Google never signed a > > >>>> software grant to Apache, which is a good thing to have. > > >>>> > > >>>> It'd be greatly appreciated if you could answer some of these > > >>>> questions, or pass on contact details of someone that can. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks > > >>>> Angus Turner > > >>>> h...@theangus.org > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > >
