Let me see if I can figure this out. On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro <[email protected]>wrote:
> Bumping this now that we are past the holidays. Are any Gwave team members > here who would be able to answer my question? > > > —Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > > On 26 December 2012 06:08, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I can only say this is a fantastic idea. > > Wave, at its heart, is a protocol - and to be successful it not only > needs > > a flagships implementation, but also the resources and information in a > > convenient form to help it spread. > > > > I'd suggest the site by structured with the easiest possible paths to > > getting a wave server running as the forefront, with supplementary > > information about various other options and extensions later. > > Possibly also a list of current running wave servers (even if its just a > > embedded google doc manually updated). It would be useful to have that > info > > up for people to test federation against eventually, or when its finally > > possible to make standalone clients people can test them against existing > > servers to ensure compatibility. > > > > And yes, Id hope google can be kind enough to give up that domain. > > > > On 26 December 2012 09:18, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I was thinking it would be nice to have a central user-focused site > about > > > wave that could introduce new users to wave and educate them about > > > different wave services, extensions, federation, etc. > > > > > > Question though: I noticed wave.org is currently owned by Google. To > > the > > > former Gwave team members here, since Google is no longer pursuing > Wave, > > > would it be possible to give other wave developers control of the > domain? > > > > > > Any comments? I also posted about this on the +Wavers > > > community< > > https://plus.google.com/114745581771396366390/posts/NDqSSeideJy> > > > if > > > you would prefer to respond there. > > > > > > —Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > > > > >
