Cool Ali.
Please let me know about questions. I am willing to answer them to my best
knowledge and point you to links.


On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:

> Christian,
>
> Thanks for these comments. I highly doubted RC2 would get through,
> since nobody had been checking on my understanding of what I had
> read/seen.
>
> I shall wait for the period to expire as is (I think) customary with
> voting, but I will not be releasing RC2, based on these fairly
> fundamental issues.
>
> Comments from other PMC on anything else missed here are welcome.
>
> Lets see how RC3 fares :) (expect it on Wednesday/Thursday).
>
> Ali
>
> On 1 June 2013 12:29, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Ali, you made a great job with that. Even when I have some points we need
> > to deal with, its fantastic that you pushed it forward. Please keep it
> on!
> >
> > Here is what I have seen so far:
> >
> > - Unusual CHANGES file: I usually see people adding issue numbers our of
> > Jira
> > - Example NOTICE file: http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt
> ,
> > Mockito is not mentioned with link as the others
> > - server-config.xml, jsongadgets.json, jaas.config no license. Maybe
> others
> > too? Please utilize: http://creadur.apache.org/rat/ it's a great tool to
> > check our licenses
> > - request_codereview wrong license (Google Inc)?
> > - files in /spec - allowed to distribute? No License given, where do
> these
> > files come from?
> > - src folder: we usually use org.apache prefix. Not seen any classes with
> > that
> > - thirdparty: allowed to distribute? Check with compatible licenses. Full
> > list whats working what not is here:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
> > - Wave Logo (/war) seems to miss TM symbol. Please check:
> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html
> > - Whats the meaning of wave-0.4-release folder?
> > - Whats the meaning of whitepapers folder?
> >
> > So far I am -1, mostly because I am concerned on the licensing things.
> > Maybe we can shed some light on it. In any way, everybody is invited to
> > help with these issues, committer or not. If you are lurking around and
> > have an interest in help Wave surviving, then pleas see this:
> > www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html
> >
> > And send in your patches!! :-)
> >
> > Thanks again Ali! Please note, the first releases are always the
> difficult.
> > When Upayavira or I do not find anything, you can be sure somebody else
> > from the IPMC finds something. Please consider this as "educational". We
> > need to make Apache Wave having some legal ground too, and thats how we
> > make sure it is all good. So please everybody, keep motivation and help
> > further with all the issues. If you do and bring out a release, I
> promise I
> > will write a blog post on it on my personal blog which is usually well
> > visited! That's my little contribution and hopefully motivating a bit.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Christian
> >
> > PS: I haven't checked signatures yet and only looked at the src package
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Ali Lown <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> It is finally time to get a release out into the world. There has been
> >> a lot of things happen since the codebase was imported to Apache in
> >> Febuary 2011. Whilst work may not have always been as quick as we
> >> like, the last week has seen a significantly revived effort (and the
> >> introduction of many new names to the list) to the whole concept of
> >> Wave.
> >>
> >> As such, I would like to release Wave 0.4 to the world.
> >>
> >> Wave 0.4 RC2 is available for review here:
> >> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc2/
> >>
> >> This is a build from the subversion tag wave-0.4-rc2 at:
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/tags/
> >>
> >> A summary can be found in the RELEASE-NOTES at:
> >> https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc2/RELEASE-NOTES
> >> and included in the tarballs.
> >>
> >> Votes, please. This vote will close at 2100 GMT 04-June 2013.
> >>
> >> [  ] +1   Release these artifacts
> >> [  ] +0   OK, but...
> >> [  ] -0    OK, but really should fix...
> >> [  ] -1    I oppose this release because...
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> Ali
> >>
> >> ---------------------------
> >> A minor note to those who recently joined the list: Only votes from
> >> the members of the PMC are binding, however votes from other
> >> committers, users, and contributors are welcomed. If your vote is
> >> negative, please leave a comment explaining clearly why. Refer to
> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for more information on
> >> this process.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.grobmeier.de
> > https://www.timeandbill.de
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

Reply via email to