An example of what I was talking about before:
https://rizzoma.com/topic/4f4d5d1aeb337f9307458e1ec8919881/

This can be embedded using:
<iframe width="550" height="550"
src="https://rizzoma.com/embedded/4f4d5d1aeb337f9307458e1ec8919881/";
frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Although the tool is not very advanced, it does allow for easy
collaboration and visibility.

 -Sam

> Although I haven't tested it myself, there is a mindmap gadget in Rizzoma
> (separate from the mindmap view). If that could be used to build this
> diagram then Rizzoma already supports anonymous access of public topics,
> and can be embedded in an octane, perhaps in the wiki?
>
> Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>It's not totally accurate IMHO. I would prefer some kind of mind map that
>>can be edited and improved over time.
>>
>>
>>On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to putting on the wiki.
>>>
>>> On 16 June 2013 21:07, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <sten...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I don't know the accuracy of the image, but I vote for its inclusion
>>> in
>>> the
>>> > wiki.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Dave <w...@glark.co.uk> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> and now as a link, rather than attachment:
>>> >>
>>> >> http://i.imgur.com/gv4qMJY.png
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 16/06/13 17:11, Dave wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I couldn't find an overview of the various bits of the wiab server,
>>> and
>>> >>> how they plumb together. So from a couple of hours digging into the
>>> >>> codebase, I knocked up the attached diagram.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I didn't include the Concurrency and Document/Conversation
>>> structure,
>>> as
>>> >>> I suspect these are better visualised differently / separately.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Is there anything inaccurate or that should be added this diagram,
>>> and
>>> is
>>> >>> it worth including in the wiki?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Dave
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Saludos,
>>> >      Bruno González
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
>>> > http://www.stenyak.com
>>>
>

Reply via email to