When the time comes, I'm prepared to have the necessary conversations to see about a VM at Apache.
Upayavira On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote: > Yes the point would be to get federation up and running. An providing a > place where we can deploy our new OT containers that will need to > communicate in a distributed way. > > On 6/21/13 3:35 PM, "Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak)" <sten...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >That sounds good. > > > >Would it be interesting to apply for a VM at apache for that? I was > >thinking on doing so if/when the email bot is finished... (so that both > >email and wave discussions of the Apache Wave group can happen under the > >umbrella of Apache) > > > >Also, are you planning on enabling federation in some of those servers? > > > > > >Either way, thanks for the efforts. > > > > > >On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Michael MacFadden < > >michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> As soon as we have a release, I am going to put the stable release on > >>two > >> servers. One will be my personal server. Another one will be a server > >> hosted by my company. I think we we have a couple environments up and > >> running it will help. > >> > >> Also, I may be able to set up some sandboxes where we can actually > >>deploy > >> some of our experiments when we start looking at P2P / Server / Hybrid > >>OT. > >> > >> ~Michael > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >Saludos, > > Bruno González > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com > >http://www.stenyak.com > >
