On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > >> 2. Only servers that are satisfy the following conditions will be > >> considered legitimate: > >> a) WIAB based > >> b) Free to use > >> c) Actively contribute back to Apache Wave. > >> > >> I think such a solution will allow to grow the Apache Wave community and > >> provide information about third party WIAB based servers that take part > >> in > >> WIAB development. > >> > >> What you think? > > Shouldn't compatibility be a requirement too? > That is, not only server<>server but server<>client. > Or, at least, a commitment to conform to the WIAB reference as it > develops its protocols.
In the end, truthfulness is what matters. We could have a section listing servers that are *not* compatible with WIAB. Wouldn't reflect very well on those servers though, I'd say, so could provide an incentive to improve compatibility. > (of course, in this specific case wiab.pro passes with ease as its > contributing protocol improvements back) Which is a good thing! Upayavira
