-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12682/#review23287
-----------------------------------------------------------


It might be interesting to move some of the comments from the (now deleted) 
HistoryProvider.java over to the remaining HistorySupport.java file. E.g. 
getToken() inline docs.

- Bruno Gonzalez


On July 17, 2013, 3:19 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12682/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 17, 2013, 3:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for wave, Bruno Gonzalez, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado, and Yuri 
> Zelikov.
> 
> 
> Repository: wave-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Whilst perusing the code for other things to delete, I happened to spot these 
> files.
> At which point I wondered why we had three classes doing a single-line 
> function call (to GWT).
> 
> As such, I compressed it all into the HistorySupport class. (Which still 
> seems excessive, but I will leave it there since it is still easy to change 
> the single implementation [presuming that was the reasoning behind using 
> three classes in the first place]).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/org/waveprotocol/box/webclient/client/HistoryProvider.java f207b83 
>   src/org/waveprotocol/box/webclient/client/HistoryProviderDefault.java 
> a2dae4a 
>   src/org/waveprotocol/box/webclient/client/HistorySupport.java 93fe852 
>   src/org/waveprotocol/box/webclient/client/WebClient.java d3e3b49 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12682/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Builds and passes test suite.
> The composition of all 7 of these 'related' (but independent) patches is 
> verified to still work as a wave server.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ali Lown
> 
>

Reply via email to