On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:48 AM, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Christian, > > Having borrowed most of this copy from the Cloud Stack > guidelines,apparently they have a list specifically devoted to marketing. > Seems like this might be a good move for Apache Wave so that developers can > focus more on what they want to without being annoyed. I've lived in both > worlds for most of my career, and neither world seems to "grok" the other > particularly well. Veto rights and majority votes seem sensible, as this is > about brand issues. However, I am noting that Wave is not an ASF listed > brand for trademarking. http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/list/
We should first perform this process: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html (mandatory for all podlings) before we really add our trademark there. The page is manually maintained and the process is "new", thats why a few trademarks appear which have not been approved by the trademarks VP. Its perfectly fine if you would start this, if you like Cheers > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier > <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:04 PM, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the >> > Cloud Stack template up to date. >> > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Apache+Wave+Social+Media+Guidelines >> >> This is very good! >> >> I would add that PMC members have a veto right to publications. Also I >> would add a note if majority is enough to publish something. >> >> reading this: "ask on the Apache Wave-marketing mailing list" made me >> think what this list is and what address it has. >> >> Cheers >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:51 PM, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Ali, >> >> >> >> Great suggestion on guidelines, will post similar for us for review. >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >> >> >>> This seems like a good idea to me. >> >>> As long as we keep multiple comitters as admins, I don't think there >> >>> should >> >>> be a problem. >> >>> >> >>> Could you first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like >> >>> CloudStack has: >> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/social-media-guidelines.html) >> >>> >> >>> Ali >> >>> On 31 Jul 2013 19:26, "John Blossom" <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > In conjunction with the Hangouts, I'd like to suggest that we create >> a >> >>> Page >> >>> > for Apache Wave on Google+ where announcements could be posted about >> >>> > Hangouts and which, if desired, could have multiple personal accounts >> >>> > authorized to manage the page. This would allow us to have stronger >> >>> Apache >> >>> > branding for Hangout events and would make it easier for us to enable >> >>> > multiple people to act as hosts for the events. It would also enable >> >>> people >> >>> > to add links to our branded Page presence on Google+, which could >> help >> >>> to >> >>> > promote participation in the community and to provide information >> about >> >>> the >> >>> > project and links to the official project Web site. >> >>> > >> >>> > Thoughts? It's very easy to set up, BTW. >> >>> > >> >>> > All the best, >> >>> > >> >>> > John Blossom >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
