@Ali another question - you mentioned that it is possible to put a file into a folder at people.apache.org and make it available for other via web interface. Is there some guide how to do this?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Yuri Zelikov <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok > On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > > I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest > > rerunning. > > > > Ali > > On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered? > >> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> > >>> RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive. > >>> > >>> Ali > >>> On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden < > >>>> michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> All, > >>>>> > >>>>> Although I have been dormant. I am willing to help out with the > >> release > >>>>> in any way possible. If you need some one to go through the release > >> and > >>>>> test it. Or post it up to he web site once we have it ready let me > >> know. > >>>>> I haven¹t helped out in a while, so I would love to contribute. > >>>>> > >>>>> ~Michael > >>>>> > >>>>> On 7/12/14, 6:05 AM, "Ali Lown" <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Yuri, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> AFAIK both of these can be TODOs can be removed now. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Ali > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 12 July 2014 14:01, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the steps and later > >> to > >>>>>>> add > >>>>>>> a release job to jenkins so the release process will be automated. > >> Off > >>>>>>> course if someone want to help with release stuff - it would be > great > >>>> :) > >>>>>>> The wiki contains two todos: > >>>>>>> 1. ODO: Do we need Extension-Name, Implementation-Vendor-Id as > well? > >>>>>>> 2. Check export status of any cryptographic dependencies. (Unknown > >>>>>>> currently whether we need an ECCN or not) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regarding the 2- I think we got rid of it, is it right? > >>>>>>> Regarding 1 - @Ali can you comment? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yuri, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I started writing up the 'procedure' here: > >>>>>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure > >>>> It > >>>>>>>> needs updating now that we use git rather than svn. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If we could get jenkins building the releases that would be great! > >>>>>>>> (wave-artifacts doesn't seem to be generating the src releases?) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Once the artifacts are made (ant release, or equivalent), then the > >>>>>>>> next step is to manually verify the contents are as expected, and > to > >>>>>>>> sign it. > >>>>>>>> I have a very small script to sign all the files using my key, and > >> to > >>>>>>>> generate the SHA512 sums for the files: > >> http://pastebin.com/05wBkWd1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the wave list to vote upon... > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the incubator list to vote upon... > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, release! ;) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ali > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 13:21, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for update Ali. > >>>>>>>>> I think the release is important to show that we handled all the > >>>>>>>> copyright > >>>>>>>>> issues, so I would prefer just to release as is and then add the > >>>>>>>> patch > >>>>>>>>> later. > >>>>>>>>> Anyway, let's try to do the release stuff for rc 05. Are there > any > >>>>>>>> scripts > >>>>>>>>> that should be run? What is the procedure? > >>>>>>>>> By the way, I already added a Jenkins job to create the release > >>>>>>>> artifact > >>>>>>>> - > >>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Wave/job/wave-artifacts/ > >>>>>>>>> So, if could to automate the licenses verification and signing we > >>>>>>>> could > >>>>>>>>> release just by running the job in Jenkins... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> RC4 was merged back in to master around January, and development > >>>> has > >>>>>>>>>> continued in master from there.. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I don't recall any major show stoppers with RC4. A look at the > >>>> vote > >>>>>>>>>> thread suggests that the only problems left to discuss were the > >>>>>>>> images > >>>>>>>>>> in thumbnail_patterns, for which we could find no copyright > >>>>>>>>>> assignment. But we fixed this problem in 48c3bc9, by changing > the > >>>>>>>>>> thumbnails to some we could attribute. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On a meta level, the problem at the time was that RC4 had a very > >>>>>>>> poor > >>>>>>>>>> vote turnout, disincentivizing further work. > >>>>>>>>>> (And on a personal level, I ran out of time I could put towards > >>>>>>>> Wave) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I don't think there is anything stopping us putting together RC5 > >>>>>>>> over > >>>>>>>>>> this weekend. > >>>>>>>>>> (Since we would want to take from current master, a check of the > >>>>>>>>>> licenses will be required to be redone). > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Is there interest in RC5? > >>>>>>>>>> (And do we want to put Frank's fulltextsearch patches in?) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>> Ali > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> I think I merged the rc 0.4 into master a while ago. But I > don't > >>>>>>>> remember > >>>>>>>>>>> what were the issues that prevented from us to release rc 0.4. > >>>>>>>>>>> @Ali, so you remember what were the issues? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Christian Grobmeier < > >>>>>>>>>> grobme...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> before quite a while, we were discussing a release. It's still > >>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>> there, > >>>>>>>>>>>> and I would like to know what the actual problem is. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> As you know, releases are considered a sign of a healthy > >>>> project > >>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> incubator. > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's currently discussed within the IPMC why projects which > >>>> don't > >>>>>>>> manage > >>>>>>>>>>>> to make a release > >>>>>>>>>>>> after a year should stay in the incubator. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Christian > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de > >>>>>>>>>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL > >>>>>>>>>>>> @grobmeier > >>>>>>>>>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
