Ok, I’ll get that updated. On 7/19/14, 10:02 AM, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The download page should refer to the official releases location at >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/wave/ > > >On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Michael MacFadden < >michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ok that makes sense. I will start working on the downloads section. I >> would like to get back in to coding after the release is done. Also >> potentially reviving the maven build. But for now, I think working on >>the >> web site will help let you all focus on code and release. So that is >>what >> I will do to contribute for now! >> >> ~Michael >> >> On 12/22/13, 7:20 PM, "Ali Lown" <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >> >> Great news on GIT. I think that will hep us immensely. I have been >> >> following a lot of the mailing list. Actually I spent quite while >> >>reading >> >> the list over the last few days. >> > >> >Yes. Subversion has been a point of 'stickiness' with new devs in the >> >past, and the workflow was quite convoluted. >> > >> >> From an Apache perspective, I do think that since we have been >> >>incubating >> >> for several years now, it is important for us to make a release soon >>if >> >>we >> >> are to stay in this community. We need to demonstrate some forward >> >> progress. >> > >> >Indeed. We have spent most of this year iterating through the previous >> >4 release candidates, so I think it would be hard to argue that we >> >have made no forward progress. >> >Getting the first release (on such a large codebase) is quite >> >challenging, but I think we are now quite close to being in a suitable >> >state for thorough inspection by the rest of the Incubator. >> > >> >> So it sounds like we need to get through the search feature, then >>turn >> >> back to an RC5 release? >> > >> >Yep. Making the release once the search feature is pushed is a few >>hours >> >work. >> >Then, we want votes. Lots of votes. :) >> > >> >> What about the web site. We don¹t really have a spot to advertise >> >> releases. For a smooth re-entry, I could start to work on that as a >> >> non-critical-path task, so that when we are ready to release the web >> >>site >> >> is ready. >> > >> >I haven't worked on that bit yet, since none of the RCs came close >>enough. >> >If you could actually build the 'release download section' - which >> >needs to make use of the Apache mirroring system - then that would be >> >really useful! >> >(Using the sample stuff on the wiki it can be thrown together in a few >> >hours, but a polished, well-integrated download flow needs a bit more >> >thought to link in to our existing site) >> > >> >More user documentation on the wiki (and actually pointing them to the >> >wiki on the download/post-download page) is also always good! >> > >> >Ali >> >> >>
