+1 On May 30, 2015 5:39 PM, "Michael MacFadden" <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > ~Michael > > > On May 30, 2015, at 3:01 AM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Ok, should we then proceed with release while adding a notice that > > federation is broken atm? > > > >> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> > >> remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know how to > >> do it, not to make it perfect. > >> > >> A release with some bugs, given the stage of development of Wave, is > >> potentially a *good* thing rather than a bad one, as it may provide > >> newcomers with the incentive to help fix those bugs. > >> > >> Let's get a legally correct release out now, and then aim to follow it > >> with another that has more bugs fixed. > >> > >> Upayavira > >> > >>> On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 09:36 PM, Yuri Z wrote: > >>> Well, actually it looks like we have an issue with federation... > >>> > >>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that we've all voted on > >>>> and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully) pass > onto > >>>> the incubator PMC for further review. > >>>> > >>>> Upayavira > >>>> > >>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote: > >>>>> A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know that I spend > >> ages > >>>>> figuring that out! :) > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> Ben > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the > >>>> documentation I > >>>>>> was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you havnt > >> heard > >>>> of > >>>>>> vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know if you > >> think > >>>>>> pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people not > >> trying > >>>> out > >>>>>> the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my tbd's. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yuri, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this weekend to > >> look at > >>>> this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that enable > >>>>>>> federation some time when I tidied them all up a while back. > >>>>>>> This wasn't found earlier because: > >>>>>>> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including re-fetching > >> all the > >>>>>>> third-party objects > >>>>>>> 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the old jars > >> - so > >>>>>>> contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary artifacts > >> were > >>>>>>> working fine when tested. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Things to note then: > >>>>>>> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not be the > >> same > >>>>>>> as the source artifacts > >>>>>>> 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check out and > >> run > >>>>>>> everything again. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We were so close... > >>>>>>> Ali > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways, let's > >>>> discuss > >>>>>>>> discuss how can we handle this... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching > >> jars/building > >>>> - it > >>>>>>>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error trying to > >> start > >>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> server? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Ali > >>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from existing > >> folder. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I see, what was the issue with federation? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability to start the server with federation > >>>>>>> enabled. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to build > >>>>>>> correctly). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES, > >> build.properties > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Started server without federation using file backends. > >> Tested > >>>>>>> wave > >>>>>>>>>>>>> creation, simple editing, etc. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Artifact naming seems good. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Was unable to start server with federation (missing > >>>>>>>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem with the > >> whack.jar > >>>>>>> file > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that is fetched during build. This is making me wonder how > >> it > >>>>>>> worked > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the same error > >>>> here, > >>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>> do you get something different when you build from the > >> artifact > >>>>>>> in a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> clean folder? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ali > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source compiles and > >> runs. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we may wish to extend the vote duration, as no-one > >>>>>>> seems > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have responded. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have just gotten around to this email in my inbox, so > >> hope > >>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> get > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this this evening... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ali > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is now available for review. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here: > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > > >>>>>>>>>> $f.sha') > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This time I included only source artifacts. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reminder on what included previous release candidates: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and RC8 included: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release related fixes. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bug Fixes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration tool for > >>>>>>> deltas > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migration > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based store. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of Socket.IO. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style initials avatars. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations in dev compilation and > >>>>>>> added > >>>>>>>>>> GWT > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superdev mode. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Federation works > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - And more... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information can be found in > >>>>>>> RELEASE-NOTES, > >>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact distribution > >>>>>>> url, as > >>>>>>>>>>>>> well as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Action Required: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test the release and make it works on your environment - > >> at > >>>>>>>>>> least > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configurations. Please go over the source files and make > >> sure > >>>>>>>>>> they > >>>>>>>>>>>>> don't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain anything that cannot be released under Apache > >> Wave > >>>>>>> due > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> legal > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May 2015. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix.... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Definitely not because... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> >
