omg... ofc. thx :)
On Aug 21, 8:22 am, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Boris wrote:
> > Thx Anthony.
> > Is this just a temporary development solution? Shouldn't *any* client
> > be able to connect to the server? Is there any special reason (except
> > that it is done like that now) why the server should bind one single
> > client (- be aware of clients before they connect?) ? Sounds like an
> > exchange server binding to one single workstation in the company
> > network ;)
>
> Umm, if you bind the WRS to the machines network reachable IP address,
> any client can get to it. If you bind it to 127.0.0.1 then only
> localhost will be able to get to it.
>
> Case in point. My WRS is on a vm with an ip address of XXX.XXX.0.57.
> I've got my NAT router doing a port forward to that address that allows
> me to connect to it from anywhere in the world (so long as I have
> internet access).
>
> --
> James Purser
> Collaborynthhttp://collaborynth.com.au
> Mob: +61 406 576 553
> Skype: purserj1977
> twitter:www.twitter.com/purserj
> GTalk: [email protected]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
