Yay! On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Jon Tirsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, many of these permissions will also be applicable on a > wavelet-by-wavelet basis. In fact, I am writing the code for that at > this very moment. :-) > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:42 AM, sim sim<[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Jon! > > Now I better understand a purpose of INDEX > > And I hope that wave authors will have full control on wavelet too, as > local > > (in his wave) moderator via wavelet settings through GRANT > > > > 2009/9/4 Jon Tirsen <[email protected]> > >> > >> This is used for members of groups if they want waves addressed to > >> that groups indexed directly into their index (think "inbox"). Waves > >> are always indexed into the groups address, this edge is used to > >> signal what other indexes to write the content of the wave in. > >> > >> This edge setting is a little bit implementation specific in its > >> current form so we probably won't standardize it in this form. For > >> example a wave provider can use read fan out instead (all groups of a > >> user are read at the same time) or a even a global index of waves. > >> > >> Nevertheless the purpose is fairly clear: "Do I want waves from this > >> group in my inbox." > >> > >> This setting is common with mailing lists too. Google Groups for > >> example has a setting on your membership whether you want email sent > >> to you or whether you want to read the messages in the list archive > >> instead. > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:11 PM, sim-sim<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Little misunderstanding about next description: > >> > > >> > "Indexed to (INDEX) - wavelets addressed to address B will be written > >> > into the index of the account associated with address A > >> > (transitively)." > >> > > >> > Whats a typical scenario using in future this edge (in depth)? How it > >> > will be presented in wavelets owner and paticipant, for example? > >> > > >> > Secondary question: Where issue tracker for this and other whitepapers > >> > errors or inconsistencies? > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
