On Sep 7, 2:21 pm, Christian Ohler <[email protected]> wrote: > That's almost right. You just need to swap old value and new value: > "For deletion components, the old values in the annotations update > match the annotations of each item in the input document [...], and > the new values match the annotations of the rightmost item generated > so far."
Ah, thanks! I realized this a few hours later while riding in the car, but it's good to have an official confirmation. Thank you to you and Sam Thorogood for answering my questions. I appreciate the time that you're taking, especially given the deadlines you're working under. Cheers, Eric P.S. There are quite a few strong mathematical constraints on the wave operations. This suggests that it might be possible to generate thousands of random valid operations, and verify that all the different equations hold. (I'm thinking of something like Haskell's QuickCheck tool, which uses random data to verify that a system of equations holds over some abstract algebra.) If you could feed thousands of machine-generated operations to a third-party wave server via XMPP, there's a good chance that you could sniff out even subtle bugs fairly quickly. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
