Hi Scott, It sounds like one thing you are suggesting is binary transport? Specifically, you wrote:
On Sep 6, 11:10 pm, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote: > Plus the 25% increase in size due to the Base64 encoding. In that case, XML is not going to work. In that context, Sam's comment about a whole new transport makes sense -- you'd have to throw out XML to get binary transport: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Sam Thorogood<[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 to Anthony's response. I don't really have anything else to add. > > Writing a whole new transport layer (even one specially designed for > > Wave) is arguably non-trivial :) I still think you have some good points, especially since small updates hopefully make up the largest part of the deltas sent and received to achieve real-time collaboration. I'll think about it some more. David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
