Hi Tad, On Sep 7, 9:36 pm, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure what utility this has but it does present an alternative > to the "signed" posts you see in forums.
Just having client signing in the protocol provides utility, because if I'm browsing forums and I see a signed post, even though signatures follow a standard, most people just get to see the base64. It would be nice to get a standard so all wavelet viewers would display it nicely. Of course, the wave protocol minimizes that by gracefully handling embedded content of an unknown type. David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
