Yes, and I imagine there is someone somewhere designing a DRM system that would stop even that (assuming it's included in all cameras).
In the end, controlling content distribution is difficult and not usually technically feasible. The military has been dealing with this problem for years and their solution is usually "trust". Don't grant access unless you trust the person to keep it secret. -Tad On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Brian May <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:41:41AM -0700, Tad Glines wrote: >> Like e-mail, a wave participant can copy all existing wave content, >> form a new wave containing that content and then add new participants. >> A wave server could be implemented such that a wavelet is restricted >> to participants from that server (think corporate wave server). But >> further control of content distribution is not possible without DRM. >> And even then, cut-and-paste is still possible unless the DRM is truly >> draconian. > > Even draconian style DRM won't prevent photographing the computer screen, and > distributing the photo. > -- > Brian May <[email protected]> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
