I am considering to take the FedOne client/server code, and separate the client's communications layer into a library. If I can do that cleanly, and if this gets accepted back into the codebase, then people can start building prototype clients at least in java by linking against this library. In that case they wouldn't need to worry about the protocol details or wait for a proper C/S protocol to be developed.
If FedOne eventually would evolve into a reference server implementation, and if the library would be maintained along the way, then the library should work with other servers that are based on FedOne. At least that's the theory - as you can see, there are some ifs. In any case, it will probably be a while until I can get around to doing this, so don't expect it around the corner. On Oct 11, 9:37 pm, ThomasWrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > I appoligise if this is discused elsewhere, but I just posted this > query on Google Wave API, and was told it might be more suitable for > this thread; > > When/how will it be possible for a pc-application to read/write to a > wave directly? > ...if it isnt already? > I'm currently playing with robots, and understand they can only be > run > of appengine at the moment. I hear talk they will in future be able > to > be run from any sever. > Would this include just running localy on a client? login, select > wave post blip, retrieve blip etc. All automaticaly? > > The concept I'm working on involves waves being used to exchange, > store, and collaboratively edit in (near) real time non-text based > data. Therefor it makes little sense for the users to see the normal > google wave client. > The specific scenaro is for the use with Augmented Reality > systems...so in most case's this will be phones or even HMD's > displaying 3d meshs at log/lat co-ordinates. > As we are currently working on a roadmap for this development, it > would be nice to see more clearly how a Wave could be viewed and > updated from a local client software rather then a user/browser > directly. > > (also, just to be clear, while we are dealing with non-text based > data, nearly > every other feature of the wave protocol is excelent for our usage. In > fact > its utterly fantastic! especialy when permissions are done and replays > a bit more stable) > > On 5 okt, 02:10, Joe Developer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > well, there is always irc, there are now a small but growing number of > > people on irc.freenode.org ##wave > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Dale Francis <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > If possible i would love to get an account to participate in this > > > discussion in a wave, haha i think it would be so much simpler to discuss > > > all this in realtime :) > > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Michael K <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:11 PM, elliottcable > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > I should point out, for anybody following this, that the discussion > > >> > has mostly moved to Wave… if you don’t have a Wave account, get in > > >> > touch with me, and I can bring your voice into the discussion there. > > > >> I have a wave account, but when I try to open the wave link mentioned > > >> earlier, I get "You are not a participant of this wave". Do I need to > > >> add myself to some group or something like that? > > >> I may not have much to contribute to the protocol itself, but I > > >> certainly would like to at least keep an eye on the discussion... > > > >> Btw, for those of you don't have a wave account, I have *a few* > > >> invites that I can spare. Please don't post your requests here - > > >> contact me in private instead. I think you should be able to get my > > >> email from my profile details if you're not a bot. > > > >> On Oct 2, 2:03 am, elliottcable <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Oh, worth noting: I cross–posted a wave on this subject; if you’re in > > >> > the preview (not the Sandbox!) click: > > > >>https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%2BsyQLkEm6V<https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com%21w%2BsyQL...> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
