On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/16/09 10:44 AM, > [email protected]<david.c.hubbard%[email protected]>wrote: > > Hi Jeroen, > > > > If your corporate firewall does not allow XMPP, your federated server > > will not be able to participate, either. > Not everyone who wants to use a client behind a firewall will be running a federation server ;) > > If the federated server can communicate correctly, and (typically) you > > are allowed access to your corporate server, you should not have any > > issues. > While there are savings to be had from making the S/S protocol similar to the C/S protocol, they are not the same scenario. > > > Correct me where I'm wrong, but I believe BOSH/HTTP would only be used > > internally on your corporate network, *if* your corporate wave server > > decides to implement a client using it. > > Currently, BOSH is not used for server-to-server connections. > > The typical deployment would be TCP/5222 for client-to-server with BOSH > as an alternate (often on port 5280), and TCP/5269 for server-to-server > (however, port allocations are a local service policy and these port > numbers are not set in stone). > > Peter > > - -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkrYpVAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzThQCeNDhof9I7Y/P0rvcGZHnZ5dCo > 6ngAnj7iyjGBGRLid6Os+CHiCDtPntMR > =Rv2f > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
