-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/27/09 7:00 PM, Daniel Danopia wrote: > I an running a web server at danopia.net and I run my wave server at > wave.danopia.net, which CNAMEs to home.danopia.net, which CNAMEs to > danopia.no-ip.org. I don't think it's necesary to use wave. but it's > recommended. You probably can use whatever, but XMPP requires each > component to have a subdomain, and Wave uses wave. for this.
In fact this is not required by XMPP, but it is a common practice among XMPP server projects (going back to the original jabberd server in 1999). > My custom > provider works with *any* JID, as long as it is labeled "google-wave". > I personally run my custom provider at newwave.danopia.net. and the > only sideaffect is some servers ignoring me completely because I don't > have _xmpp-server._tcp.newwave.danopia.net. DNS SRV records are not absolutely mandatory to run XMPP-based services, unless you are running them on non-standard ports. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrnngEACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxofgCdF96AgqKzO9OAAjIL0BDnbw+j VSEAmwZkMy4boAX0SiGa/4YPbRuafpkJ =Yz4Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
