I've had some good luck getting my Wave Server up and running.  I haven't
managed to federate with anyone yet; I haven't found anyone with open ports.
However, my port is open, so you should be able to connect.

I used Openfire, and it works nicely for me.  Check out
http://www.orient-lodge.com/node/3807 for details.

If you have a wave server you want to test federation with, let me know.  So
far, I've only used the run-client-console.sh to connect to my server.
However, I have built the same console on a different machine and managed to
connect using the
/connect u...@domain wave.orient-lodge.com 9876

to connect back to my wave server.

If you give this a test, please create a wave and add [email protected]
to the wave.

Another thing that I've found interesting...

I've set up a shell,

#!/bin/bash
cd /home/waveserver/wave-protocol
./run-client-console.sh $USER

Then, I create users and in /etc/password use that as my login shell.  Then,
when people ssh to my server with an appropriate userid and password, the
get right to the client-console.  Works nicely.

Aldon

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of ARGold
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 12:22 PM
To: Wave Protocol
Subject: Can't Federate, can't attach remote client, local client works



Hello:

Trying to run the server on Windows Server 2003

I gave up on Openfire because of SSL issues and an XML problem, I went
to Prosody yesterday.  I followed the guide on the wiki.

The server will not federate with Acmwave.  At first there would be a
long timeout before the "remote-server-not-found" error returned but I
found an issue with my SRV record (wave.wavewriter.org).  Once I fixed
that, now the ping error return is immediate:

<iq type="error" to="wave.wavewriter.org" from="wave.acmewave.com"
id="7270-0">
  <error type="cancel">
    <remote-server-not-found xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-
stanzas"/>
  </error>
</iq>
Exception in thread "pool-2-thread-1" java.lang.NullPointerException

Furthermore, I can run multiple clients on the local machine with the
server and they work fine - sharing a wave.  However if I run the
client on another machine (inside my firewall), then I cannot
connect.  At first, there was no indication of connection attempt on
either the Prosody or WRS console, but I found a blog which suggested
adding "component_interface = "0.0.0.0"."

After doing that, the prosody console now indicates an attempt to
connect:

socket                         debug    server:lua accepted new client
connection from 192.168.0.12:59197 to 5275
jcp5090                        info     Incoming Jabber component
connection
jcp5090                        info     Disconnecting component,
<stream:error> is: xml-not-well-formed
socket                         debug    server.lua: closed client
handler and removed socket from list
jcp5090                        info     component disconnected: nil
(stream error)

still, there is no indication of a connection attempt on the WRS
console.

"xml-not-well-formed" reminds me of the issue I was having with the
Openfire console that is the "XML Problem" mentioned above.  I asked
for help at:  http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/wiki/ConsoleClient
but got no replies (still asking for help there).

Furthermore, I tried updating the wave-protocol (my copy was about 3
weeks old) from mercurial this morning and now it will not build.  I
posted that issue in a separate message.

This has been a slow process for me building this up on Windows Server
2003.  I seem to be running into every issue that is out there.
(including debugging errors that STILL exist in the Windows build
instructions after I posted comments).


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to