Hi all,
I have written up some of my thoughts regarding the server ack on my
blog:
http://www.thinkbottomup.com.au/site/blog/Google_Wave_Operational_Transform_and_Server_Acknowledgments
Please feel free to contact me regarding errors and omission in what I
have written. I hope to write more about Wave client/server OT
implementation when I find some time.
Cheers,
Dan
On Nov 19, 10:59 pm, Daniel Paull <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for posting. Background for others - I discussed this issue
> with David today and asked him to post his response here as it
> certainly helped me understand the Wave OT algorithms better.
>
> After much discussion today, I am sure I understand how the server
> acknowledgements fit into the scheme of things and am convinced that
> the the use of server acks does not imply that latency is proportional
> to the number of concurrent operations performed by clients. I must
> say though, the OT white paper is not as clear as it could be in some
> regards. I'll try to write up my thoughts on this at some point to
> help others who might be trying to understand the differences between
> Wave and Jupiter.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dan
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
