Hey, thanks for those. They're fairly close to how we represent things. A great idea though: you've inspired me to construct some diagrams we can publish to ease understanding of the models. My to-do list is a bit long at the moment but hopefully I'll get some quiet time over the holiday period to knock these out.
Thanks again for taking the initiative to create your own. Alex 2009/12/7 Kapali Viswanathan <[email protected]> > Hello: > > I have started making some diagrams for Google Wave architecture in order > to help me understand the system better. I thought that I could use UML for > this purpose. The attached documents have two diagrams (Data Model and > Conversation Model) at the following URLs. > > http://www.waveprotocol.org/whitepapers/google-wave-architecture > http://www.waveprotocol.org/draft-protocol-specs/wave-conversation-model > > Please feel free to send your feedbacks. > > PS: A Wave-based collaborative UML drawing tool (that could look something > like Enterprise Architect) may be a really good idea. If it can generate > code also, that would be a killer. > > Regards, > Kapali Viswanathan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
