i cant seem to be able to apply that diff (http:// codereview.waveprotocol.org/32002). and http://codereview.waveprotocol.org/31002 too
On Jan 7, 8:28 pm, Anthony Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > There is an agent framework already. It's pretty limited, it only > supports reacting to events. > > You might like to look athttp://codereview.waveprotocol.org/32002/showwhich > is an example of > an agent that takes HTTP requests and triggers wave actions based on > them. > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 21:07, Bernardo Ferreira > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6 Jan, 21:55, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is your collaborative framework behind a firewall or is it directly > >> internet facing? If it's internet facing then does it have an api that > >> can be tapped into by the Robot itself? > > > Well, it does have an api but if I was to use it on the Robot, that > > would make it (and Wave) a client of the framework, while the idea is > > to have Wave as a new resource of the framework, and the robot making > > the bridge between Wave (as resource) and the events coming from the > > framework. Furthermore, I have full access to the framework's code > > (though it wasn't developed by me) and can change/extend it at will. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Wave Protocol" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- > Anthony Baxter, [email protected]
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
