Hi James,
> Unique Ids based on wave ids could work. However who generates the id? > If you leave it up to the client there is the possibility of id > collision (unless you do say a hash of something like date/time joined > the wave plus salt). > the ID problem exists anyway in FedOne. When I create a new wave or blip I must provide a random ID each time. There is always the risk of collisions unless we change the C/S protocol to provide IDs. However, this would create some trouble while working offline because in this case there is no server available for creating unique IDs. Greetings Torben > It's doable. I'll think on it some more > > -- > James Purser > http://wavingtheshiny.collaborynth.com.au > Wave Addresses: > [email protected] (wave.google.com) > [email protected] (wavesandbox.com) > [email protected] (collaborynth.com.au FedOne Server) > Skype: purserj1977 > GTalk: [email protected] > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > > > -- --------------------------- Prof. Torben Weis Universitaet Duisburg-Essen [email protected]--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
