That is well understood James. The problem is that what has been published by Google is an incomplete cient/server implementation and some terse documentation that does not, in my opinion, provide enough detail to actually implement a Wave client and server from the ground up.
Dan On Jan 21, 3:37 am, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 07:08 -0800, Daniel Paull wrote: > > My answer to the original question is > > "implement server acknowledgements as documented in the Google OT > > whitepaper and the problem no longer exists." > > Okay, I'd just like to point out something. FedOne is open source. The > FedOne project is accepting patches for review and inclusion from > outside Google. If you believe there is a deficiency and can fix it, > please send it in. Improving FedOne can only be a good thing. > > Thanks > -- > James Purserhttp://wavingtheshiny.collaborynth.com.au > Wave Addresses: > [email protected] (wave.google.com) > [email protected] (wavesandbox.com) > [email protected] (collaborynth.com.au FedOne Server) > Skype: purserj1977 > GTalk: [email protected]
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
