Hello, Le 29 janv. 2010 à 13:17, chiang a écrit :
> Hi all, > > This could already have been a known deficiency in the federation > architecture, but I would like to enquire if it is by design that we > have authoritative or master wave servers for a particular wave? As > I've just found out that if the Fedone wave server (which hosts a > master copy of my initiating wave) goes down or losses all the waves, > the Fedone wave server does not recover the wave from wavesandbox, > which also has a copy of the wave. I initially thought wave servers > federation is supposed to be scalable, and resilient... Fedone is an example implementation, not a production ready wave server. For example, it still miss the storage engine, is not clustered etc. So this limitation is not by design but simply a not-yet-implemented feature. Having an authoritative server for every wave seems a good and needed approach for the Wave protocol itself. -- Mickaël Rémond http://www.process-one.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
