These changes are now live on wavesandbox.com. Please let us know if you see anything broken.
Thanks, Anthony On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:10, Anthony Baxter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > As a heads up, we'll be pushing a new version of the federation code > to wavesandbox.com shortly. This new release contains a significant > refactor which is more robust in how it handles error conditions and > also generates a richer set of error responses, which we hope will > make it easier for other wave providers (using FedOne or other > implementations). The error handling is using standard XMPP error > stanzas, as documented in IETF RFC 3920. > > We'll be updating the federation specification to go into more detail. > While we expect FedOne-based deployments will continue to operate > normally after this new release, other implementations may need to be > modified to gracefully respond to the various error responses > generated. Please let us know if you see glitches, and we'll keep an > eye on things from our side. > > In addition to the changes to wavesandbox.com, we're working to merge > this new XMPP code into FedOne, so that the mercurial repository will > match the new wavesandbox.com release. > > In other news, those who were watching the checkins saw a new agent, > probey. This provides an extremely bare-bones HTTP interface to a wave > server, allowing you to create, modify, and view waves. It's > deliberately limited to the purposes it was written for (automated > end-to-end testing and monitoring of wavesandbox.com), but we hope it > will be useful for you too, and perhaps even inspire you to look at > taking the code and extending it further. > > Finally, we're thinking about some improvements for the next version > for the federation protocol - in particular, bundling of signatures as > an optional part of a submit-request, removing the pubsub envelope on > post/get signer request/responses and specifying the error messages > exchanged by federated wave providers. If you have specific > suggestions about how to improve the server-to-server federation > protocol, it's a great time to propose them. > > Thanks, > > Anthony > > -- > Anthony Baxter, [email protected] > -- Anthony Baxter, [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
