The patch I sent earlier doesn't include the jetty patch. I'll try and
remember to send that tomorrow.

-Tad

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]> wrote:

> These jetty patches included in your patch (I too use the dev channel
> for chrome)?
> And I prematurely jumped on the compile_gwt, the failure is there but
> from your comments I won't worry.
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I tried it on a clean clone of io2010 and it build fine. You will get an
> > error about JavaRegExp.java but you can ignore it because that class
> isn't
> > used anywhere yet.
> > You should see 15 permutations compiled.
> >
> > You might want to try this set of commands:
> > ant clean
> > ant
> > ant compile_gwt
> >
> > I found that the dev channel version of chrome updated their websocket
> code
> > to the version 76 protocol and the jetty verison in wave only supports
> > websocket protocol verison 75.
> > I found that the latest version i the jetty source repo has the updates
> and
> > when I patched the wave version of jetty with those files it worked with
> the
> > dev channel version of chrome.
> >
> > -Tad
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> compile_gwt fails with this patch applied :(
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:49 PM, James Purser <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Tad,
> >> >
> >> > I'll give the patch a go, thanks.
> >> >
> >> > I've also submitted the original email as an issue so if you want to
> >> > attach the patch there that would be great :)
> >> >
> >> > http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues/detail?id=95
> >> >
> >> > James Purser
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> --Matt
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Wave Protocol" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Wave Protocol" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --Matt
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to