best source IMO remains the original articles on wavenz: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ablog.wavenz.com+operational+transformation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
d3developer.com | twitter.com/fractastical | twitter.com/jdietz On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Joseph Gentle <[email protected]> wrote: > The best documentation of transformation I've found has been the unit tests > for it: > > http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/browse/test/org/waveprotocol/wave/model/document/operation/algorithm/DocOpTransformerTest.java?repo=io2010 > That doesn't give you a sample implementation for transformation, but it > does spec out the function pretty thoroughly. > > -J > > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Daniel Paull <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't think that the transformation functions have been published in >> any form other than the source code, so that is the definitive >> reference - as cryptic as it is. It is well known that Wave OT is >> derived from the Jupiter Collaborative system. Search for a paper >> titled, "High-latency, low-bandwidth windowing in the Jupiter >> collaboration system" - the transformation functions used in Jupiter >> shouldn't be too different from those used in Wave, so they may help >> you reverse engineer the transformation functions from the code. I >> know that's completely backwards, but that's what the Wave team chose >> to give us to work with. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dan >> >> On Jul 11, 12:25 pm, Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I was wondering if someone could help me understand the algorithm for >> > transforming operations. I took a look at the source code, and tried >> > to trace it through, but it didn't end up helping much. >> > >> > Obviously, we can't simply compare component by component and >> > transform them against each other. But we also can't do one operation >> > and then the other on top of it. Can anyone write/point me in the >> > direction of some pseudocode, perhaps? Just to clarify what's supposed >> > to be going on without having to decipher the specific class structure >> > of the sample code. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Turner >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Wave Protocol" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
