Hi everybody,
It seems that we are confused! We are working on a project related to larg-scale distribued data management approach. We have already used the Google Wave Federation Protocol as an underlaying protocol for federation among servers which stores different types of data. The main critique for our implementation was that we rely on GW which is no longer supported by Google! As to our undersanding, the GWFP is a specification and FedOne is one implementation, right? The question now, does it make sense to continue working on the project even with the use of FedOne since we are developing a prototype and we use a protocol which will still exist even after the GW product death? Is there any problem with our approach if we use a ready protocol instead of inventing a new one? Thank you very much for helping us to differentiate between stopping support of GW product and the GWFP itself. Zakwan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
